A automation and integration for a construction business tackles one specific leak: dockets, timesheets, plant hours and delivery notes captured on site get re-keyed into your project and accounting systems by hand. It is slow, it ties up admin time, and every re-key is a chance for an error that corrupts a cost report and gets discovered too late to fix cleanly. Bamco builds it around the tools you already run, so it fits your operation rather than forcing you to change how you work.
Information current as at 4 July 2026
Dockets, timesheets, plant hours and delivery notes captured on site get re-keyed into your project and accounting systems by hand. It is slow, it ties up admin time, and every re-key is a chance for an error that corrupts a cost report and gets discovered too late to fix cleanly.
This is not a generic problem with a generic tool bolted on. It is a specific leak in a construction business, and the system is built to close it. You can see the full picture of where a construction business leaks margin on the construction industry page.
The integrations that move site data into your office systems automatically. Field capture from a tool like Assignar or your site app flows into your accounting and project systems without re-keying, dockets and timesheets reconcile against jobs, and the handoffs that used to depend on someone remembering to update the other system just happen. Where a tool has no clean connector, we build the path that works, with error handling so nothing fails silently.
Bring us the idea you already have, or book an audit and we map where the money is leaking. Either way, you deal directly with the senior team that designs and builds it.
Week one. From week one, the double entry starts disappearing: data captured on site shows up in the office systems without an admin re-typing it, freeing hours and removing a whole class of transcription errors.
Month three. By month three the flow between site and office runs itself, your cost data is cleaner because it is entered once, and your admin team is doing reconciliation and exceptions rather than data entry.
Engagements typically start around $50k and are scoped after a systems audit, priced as a fraction of what a legacy build of the same capability would have quoted. You get a fixed-scope proposal with a real number before anything is built, and you own what we build. The point is not the price. It is that a well-built automation and integration for a construction business is meant to pay for itself in multiples, by plugging a leak that is costing you every week it stays open.
Whether you can name exactly what you want built, or you just know something is leaking, the next step is the same conversation.